Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.90 Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.90 Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct is 89% cheaper overall.

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Wins
2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.313.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
30.469.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
9.146.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-54.9-
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
37.1--
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedUnknownOct 2024

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.