Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.10Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.40 Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct is 43% cheaper overall.

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Wins
2
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.314.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
30.469.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
9.148.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
37.1--
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A82.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedUnknownOct 2025

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.5, compared to Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.