Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Xiaomi

Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Phi 4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Phi 4
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi 4MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi 4MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftXiaomi
ReleasedJan 2025Dec 2025

Phi 4 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi 4 with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Phi 4 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Phi 4 has cheaper output pricing at $0.14/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Phi 4's score of 11.2.
Phi 4 has a 16,384 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Phi 4 does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.