Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs Mistral Medium 3.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.1
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BMistral Medium 3.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.62$0.40 Mistral Medium 3.1
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.62$2.00 WizardLM-2 8x22B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, WizardLM-2 8x22B is 23% cheaper overall.

WizardLM-2 8x22B Providers

No provider data available

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
WizardLM-2 8x22B Wins
2
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkWizardLM-2 8x22BMistral Medium 3.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.121.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-18.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-38.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
40.068.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
17.658.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.6-
Aider
Real-world code editing
44.4--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
48.6--
Mistral Medium 3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

WizardLM-2 8x22B
65,535
tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BMistral Medium 3.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A78.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.42s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BMistral Medium 3.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BMistral Medium 3.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftMistral AI
ReleasedApr 2024Aug 2025

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision.