Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.62$0.90 WizardLM-2 8x22B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.62$0.90 WizardLM-2 8x22B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, WizardLM-2 8x22B is 31% cheaper overall.

WizardLM-2 8x22B Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
WizardLM-2 8x22B Wins
3
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.113.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
40.069.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
17.646.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
44.454.9
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
48.6--
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

WizardLM-2 8x22B
65,535
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedApr 2024Oct 2024

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper input pricing at $0.62/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.