Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.62$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.62$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 72% cheaper overall.

WizardLM-2 8x22B Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
WizardLM-2 8x22B Wins
2
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.114.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
40.069.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
17.648.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
Aider
Real-world code editing
44.4--
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
48.6--
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

WizardLM-2 8x22B
65,535
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A82.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedApr 2024Oct 2025

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.5, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.