Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Xiaomi

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2024Mar 2026

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.