Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Z-ai

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GLM 5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM 5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BGLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftZ-ai
ReleasedApr 2024Feb 2026

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Compare GLM 5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper input pricing at $0.62/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.