Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Minimax
Minimax

MiniMax-01 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax-01 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax-01
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax-01
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax-01MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax-01MiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxMinimax
ReleasedJan 2025Mar 2026

MiniMax-01 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax-01 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax-01 has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. MiniMax-01 has cheaper output pricing at $1.10/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to MiniMax-01's score of N/A.
MiniMax-01 has a 1,000,192 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
MiniMax-01 supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.