Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.1 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Ministral 3 8B 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Ministral 3 8B 2512
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
Ministral 3 8B 2512
Speed
Ministral 3 8B 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Ministral 3 8B 2512
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Ministral 3 8B 2512
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Ministral 3 8B 2512 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Ministral 3 8B 2512 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Ministral 3 8B 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Ministral 3 8B 2512's score of 10.0.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Ministral 3 8B 2512 has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Ministral 3 8B 2512 supports vision.