Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Mistral Medium 3.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Mistral Medium 3.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision.