Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

MiniMax M2.1 vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMoonshotai
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.