Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nousresearch
Nousresearch

MiniMax M2.1 vs Hermes 4 405B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Hermes 4 405B wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Hermes 4 405B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Hermes 4 405B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxNousresearch
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Hermes 4 405B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Hermes 4 405B's score of 18.1.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Hermes 4 405B has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Hermes 4 405B does not support vision.