Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

MiniMax M2.1 vs Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VLWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.10$0.60 Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL is 37% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.28
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Providers

DeepInfra $0.20 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
6
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VLWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.510.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.85.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.726.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.564.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.043.9
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.034.5
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Max output: 196,608 tokens
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
131,072
tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 33% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VLWinner
Tokens/second68.1 tok/s134.2 tok/s
Time to First Token1.45s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL responds 97% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxNvidia
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision.