Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Nov 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.4, compared to MiniMax M2.1's score of 32.8.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini supports vision.