Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.25 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$2.00 MiniMax M2.1
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03N/A MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.1 is 36% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30
Friendli $0.30

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Providers

Alibaba $0.25 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.4--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.5--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.0--
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has a 25% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner
Tokens/second53.2 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token3.30sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare Qwen3.5-35B-A3B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports vision.