Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Tngtech

MiniMax M2.1 vs DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1DeepSeek R1T2 ChimeraWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.25 DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.85 DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$125000.00 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera is 9% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera Providers

Chutes $0.25 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1DeepSeek R1T2 ChimeraWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.5--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.5--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.0--
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
163,840
tokens
Max output: 163,840 tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 17% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1DeepSeek R1T2 ChimeraWinner
Tokens/second63.7 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.45sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxTngtech
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera has cheaper output pricing at $0.85/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera has a 163,840 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera does not support vision.