Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Z-ai

MiniMax M2.1 vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5V Turbo
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1GLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1GLM-5V Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
GLM-5V Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.2, compared to MiniMax M2.1's score of 32.8.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.