Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.5 vs Mixtral 8x7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2023

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Mixtral 8x7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Mixtral 8x7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.42/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Mixtral 8x7B Instruct's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Mixtral 8x7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Mixtral 8x7B Instruct does not support vision.