Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

MiniMax M2.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Kimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.40 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.75 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$200000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 29% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Kimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.040.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.434.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-94.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-84.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.883.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-85.3-
Kimi K2 Thinking shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 22% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Kimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second80.3 tok/s87.6 tok/s
Time to First Token1.52s0.62s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Kimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Kimi K2 Thinking
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxMoonshotai
ReleasedFeb 2026Nov 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of 34.8.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.