Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nex-AGI

MiniMax M2.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxNex-AGI
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.1 Nex N1 does not support vision.