Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

MiniMax M2.5 vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxNvidia
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B's score of 31.2.