Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-4o-mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-4o-mini wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
GPT-4o-mini
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5GPT-4o-mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5GPT-4o-mini
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2024

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-4o-mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare GPT-4o-mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. GPT-4o-mini has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to GPT-4o-mini's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while GPT-4o-mini has a 128,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. GPT-4o-mini supports vision.