Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Reka

MiniMax M2.5 vs Reka Flash 3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Reka Flash 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Reka Flash 3
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
Reka Flash 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Reka Flash 3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Reka Flash 3
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxReka
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Reka Flash 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Reka Flash 3 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Reka Flash 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Reka Flash 3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Reka Flash 3's score of 8.9.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Reka Flash 3 has a 65,536 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Reka Flash 3 does not support vision.