Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Sao10k

MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.65 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$0.75 Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 22% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.85

Benchmark Comparison

3
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.0--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.8--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 36% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BWinner
Tokens/second71.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.67sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxSao10k
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2024

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B does not support vision.