Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Undi95

MiniMax M2.5 vs ReMM SLERP 13B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

ReMM SLERP 13B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5ReMM SLERP 13B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5ReMM SLERP 13B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxUndi95
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2023

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

ReMM SLERP 13B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. ReMM SLERP 13B has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while ReMM SLERP 13B has a 6,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. ReMM SLERP 13B does not support vision.