Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Codestral 2508

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Codestral 2508
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Codestral 2508
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Codestral 2508
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Codestral 2508
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Codestral 2508 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Codestral 2508 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Codestral 2508's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Codestral 2508 does not support vision.