Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Devstral Medium

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Devstral Medium wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Devstral Medium

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Devstral Medium
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Devstral Medium
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral Medium Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Devstral Medium with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Devstral Medium's score of 15.9.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Devstral Medium has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Devstral Medium does not support vision.