Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Devstral Small 1.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Devstral Small 1.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Devstral Small 1.1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Devstral Small 1.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Devstral Small 1.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Devstral Small 1.1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral Small 1.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Devstral Small 1.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Devstral Small 1.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Devstral Small 1.1's score of 12.1.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Devstral Small 1.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Devstral Small 1.1 does not support vision.