Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Devstral Small 2505

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Devstral Small 2505 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Devstral Small 2505
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Devstral Small 2505
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Devstral Small 2505
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral Small 2505 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Devstral Small 2505 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Devstral Small 2505 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Devstral Small 2505's score of 12.2.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Devstral Small 2505 has a 128,000 token context window.