Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Pixtral Large 2411

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Pixtral Large 2411 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Pixtral Large 2411

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Pixtral Large 2411
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Pixtral Large 2411
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Nov 2024

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Pixtral Large 2411 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Pixtral Large 2411 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Pixtral Large 2411's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Pixtral Large 2411 has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Pixtral Large 2411 supports vision.