Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

MiniMax M2.7 vs Kimi K2 0711

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2 0711
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2 0711
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMoonshotai
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Kimi K2 0711 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Kimi K2 0711's score of 22.1.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision.