Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

MiniMax M2.7 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxNvidia
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window.