Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-4 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GPT-4 Turbo wins:

  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GPT-4 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GPT-4 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 2024

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-4 Turbo Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare GPT-4 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to GPT-4 Turbo's score of 21.5.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GPT-4 Turbo has a 128,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. GPT-4 Turbo supports vision.