Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GPT-4.1 Nano wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
GPT-4.1 Nano
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
GPT-4.1 Nano
Speed
GPT-4.1 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GPT-4.1 Nano
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GPT-4.1 Nano
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-4.1 Nano Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-4.1 Nano has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's score of 11.2.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GPT-4.1 Nano has a 1,047,576 token context window.