Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Feb 2026

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to MiniMax M2.7's score of 41.9.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.