Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

MiniMax M2.7 vs o3 Mini High

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

o3 Mini High wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
o3 Mini High

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7o3 Mini High
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7o3 Mini High
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Feb 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

o3 Mini High Modalities

Input
textfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare o3 Mini High with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to o3 Mini High's score of 17.3.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while o3 Mini High has a 200,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. o3 Mini High does not support vision.