Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Opengvlab
Opengvlab

MiniMax M2.7 vs InternVL3 78B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7InternVL3 78B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7InternVL3 78B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxOpengvlab
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare InternVL3 78B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. InternVL3 78B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to InternVL3 78B's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. InternVL3 78B supports vision.