Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Relace

MiniMax M2.7 vs Relace Apply 3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Relace Apply 3 wins:

  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Relace Apply 3
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Relace Apply 3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Relace Apply 3
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxRelace
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Relace Apply 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Relace Apply 3 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Relace Apply 3's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Relace Apply 3 has a 256,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Relace Apply 3 does not support vision.