Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Thedrummer

MiniMax M2.7 vs Skyfall 36B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls

Skyfall 36B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Skyfall 36B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Skyfall 36B V2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxThedrummer
ReleasedMar 2026Mar 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Skyfall 36B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Skyfall 36B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Skyfall 36B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Skyfall 36B V2's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Skyfall 36B V2 has a 32,768 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Skyfall 36B V2 does not support vision.