Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Tngtech

MiniMax M2.7 vs DeepSeek R1T Chimera

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

DeepSeek R1T Chimera wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1T Chimera
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7DeepSeek R1T Chimera
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7DeepSeek R1T Chimera
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxTngtech
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek R1T Chimera Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare DeepSeek R1T Chimera with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek R1T Chimera has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. DeepSeek R1T Chimera has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to DeepSeek R1T Chimera's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while DeepSeek R1T Chimera has a 163,840 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. DeepSeek R1T Chimera does not support vision.