Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
D
Deepcogito

MiniMax M2.7 vs Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxDeepcogito
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo has a unknown token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Cogito v1 Preview Llama 70B Turbo does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.