Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Upstage

MiniMax M2.7 vs SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls

SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxUpstage
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while SOLAR 10.7B Instruct v1 has a 4,096 token context window.