Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Zero One Ai

MiniMax M2.7 vs zero-one-ai/Yi-34B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls

zero-one-ai/Yi-34B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7zero-one-ai/Yi-34B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7zero-one-ai/Yi-34B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxZero One Ai
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

zero-one-ai/Yi-34B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. zero-one-ai/Yi-34B has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while zero-one-ai/Yi-34B has a 4,096 token context window.