Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Codestral 2508 vs Devstral 2 2512

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Codestral 2508
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Devstral 2 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestral 2508Devstral 2 2512
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodestral 2508Devstral 2 2512
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2025

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Codestral 2508 with:

Compare Devstral 2 2512 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Codestral 2508 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Codestral 2508 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.7, compared to Codestral 2508's score of N/A.
Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window, while Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window.
Codestral 2508 does not support vision. Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision.