Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Codestral 2508 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Larger context window

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
Codestral 2508
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestral 2508Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodestral 2508Mistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2024

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Codestral 2508 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Codestral 2508 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Codestral 2508 does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.