Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Codestral 2508 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Codestral 2508
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestral 2508GPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodestral 2508GPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Codestral 2508 with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Codestral 2508 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Codestral 2508 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Codestral 2508's score of N/A.
Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Codestral 2508 does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.