Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Xiaomi

Codestral 2508 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Codestral 2508
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestral 2508MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodestral 2508MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIXiaomi
ReleasedAug 2025Mar 2026

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Codestral 2508 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Codestral 2508 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Codestral 2508 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Codestral 2508's score of N/A.
Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Codestral 2508 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.