Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Devstral 2 2512 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45N/A Devstral 2 2512
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 67% cheaper overall.

Devstral 2 2512 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
6
Devstral 2 2512 Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
22.014.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
23.710.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
36.78.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
76.269.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
59.448.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
44.829.0
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
Devstral 2 2512 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Devstral 2 2512
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Devstral 2 2512
262,144
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Devstral 2 2512 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second81.2 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.39s0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral 2 2512Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2025

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral 2 2512 with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.7, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.