Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Devstral Medium vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Devstral Medium wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral Medium
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Devstral Medium

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral MediumMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral MediumMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2024

Devstral Medium Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral Medium with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Devstral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.9, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Devstral Medium has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Devstral Medium does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.